
This is an earlier version of the photo used for class this week. I think it's actually better because it's simpler, more direct - more powerful.
*
I was struck by many of the photos submitted this week. Simple and powerful: The dog by the lake, the incredible deep landscape, the spring-loaded rowers under the bridge - and others. And I don't mean simplistic. After taking this class I have much more appreciation for what goes into taking a good photograph, and how simplicity may be the result of a lot of work and thought filtered through an artistic vision.
*
I think seeing this has led me to a new insight. In the version of this photo submitted to class I added a layer (another unrelated photo blended in) towards the end of the process. This adds a bit of a tacked-on quality that subtracts from the integrity of the whole. In work since then I am beginning the process with the blending of unrelated photos. This leads to a more "authentic" underlying structure (I feel anyway). Then that structure can blossom into what it needs to. I feel this latter work is a return to a more powerful simplicity for me. On several new works I had to stop myself: "It's done!"
*
It reminds me of some of the better paintings I got when I first started many years ago. When I look back at them now I see something - yes they were simple, but they had something. Truth? I dunno....hmmm.
*
It does remind me of my first teacher telling me that painting is not putting makeup on someone's face, no. We're painting from the underlying structure. There's a reason that dab of color goes in that certain spot. And now, after years of painting many "abstracts", I still feel this is true.